Jump to Navigation

San Francisco, California Personal Injury Blog

The Most Wanted List: Airline Safety Recommendations

  • 27
  • July
    2010

While not nearly as familiar to the public as the criminal "most wanted" lists that hang from post office bulletin boards, the National Transportation Safety Board's most wanted list contains items that are just as important to anyone who is an airplane passenger.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has identified seven key areas of aviation safety that need improvement. However, a cursory analysis of the NTSB's list will reveal the monumental task they face in order to achieve their proposed reforms...

1. Oversight of Pilot Proficiency
To improve oversight, airlines need to: (1) review any notices of disapproval for flight checks as a part of the pilot hiring process, and (2) establish remedial training and oversight programs for crew members who have shown performance deficiencies or experienced failures in a training environment.

It appears that airlines have made no progress on the first objective, so pilots who have previously been disapproved for flight may still be hired without a thorough investigation of the circumstances behind the prior disapproval. While it has made some strides toward improved oversight and remedial training, the NTSB is still waiting for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to implement a comparable program for pre-hiring assessment.

2. Image Recorders
In a push to take "black box" technology to a new level, the NTSB would like all cockpits to have crash-protected image recorders that will provide crash investigators with more information than the data and voice recorders currently in use.

As of February 2010, the FAA still had not made image recorders a requirement. Even though video recorders could help prevent accidents by providing more information to investigators and safety engineers about the reasons that accidents occur, it appears that this item may remain on NTSB's most wanted list for a long time.

3. Safety of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Flights
EMS flights transport seriously ill patients and organ donors to emergency care facilities by plane or helicopter, but all too often they are involved in accidents that kill or injure patients, medical staff and flight crew. The NTSB would like to see stricter regulations put in place for EMS flights, and wants the FAA to develop programs to evaluate flight risks for EMS operators and medical personnel.

The NTSB has also asked for EMS aircrafts to be equipped with terrain awareness and warning systems, and has recommended a more formalized EMS flight dispatch process that includes up-to-the-minute information about weather conditions.

The FAA started the formal rulemaking process to address these concerns in April 2009, but appears to have made little progress so far. We all depend on emergency medical crews to help us or our loved ones in times of crisis, so keeping those flights safe for everyone should be a top priority.

4. Runway Safety
The issue of runway safety has been on the most wanted list since 1990, and there are four recommendations the NTSB would like the FAA to adopt:

  • a safety system for ground movement that can provide direct warning to the cockpit in the event of probable ground collisions
  • specific air traffic control clearance for each runway crossing
  • an automated system that alerts pilots when a takeoff is attempted on the incorrect runway
  • landing distance assessments with safety margins for every landing

These measures would help prevent collision-related injuries to passengers and flight crew, and to airline workers on the ground as well. The FAA is making slow progress on improving runway safety, but the NTSB is still awaiting action on many of these items.

5. Flying in Icy Conditions
Planes are often grounded due to icing, since the accumulation of ice on an airplane can severely affect its performance, sometimes even cause important equipment to fail. The NTSB recommends improving aircraft design and revising approval procedures for flight during icy conditions. Among other recommendations, the NTSB suggests that aircraft with pneumatic de-ice boots -- devices that allow for in-flight ice removal -- should be required to activate the boots as soon as the airplane enters icing conditions.

The FAA has promised action in several of these matters, but has not yet taken formal steps to address them.

6. Improving Crew Resource Management
Flight crews for commuter and on-demand air taxis need crew resource management training, which involves reviewing accidents and presenting skills and techniques to prevent future accidents. The current training requirements for commuter and on-demand flights are less stringent than for commercial flights.  

The FAA proposed a new rule addressing this issue in May 2009; once it is finalized, the NTSB will be able to cross this item off the most wanted list.

7. Incidents Caused by Human Fatigue
Many preventable accidents occur due to human fatigue, and in the airline industry even a simple mistake can cost lives. The NTSB has recommended that the FAA work to prevent fatigue-related accidents by placing limits on working hours for flight crews, mechanics and air traffic controllers, and by developing fatigue awareness and management programs.

The FAA has taken limited action to revise existing regulations and scheduling practices, but more work is needed in this area to make sure that fatigued airline workers get the rest they need to keep air travel safe.

There are an average of 36 aviation accidents reported to the NTSB each year, many of which result in death or serious injury. As the demand for air travel continues to grow, the FAA should take all steps necessary to prevent accidents and ensure the safety of passengers and crew.

The Causes of Aviation Accidents

  • 21
  • July
    2010

Each plane crash is unique. With any aviation accident, a variety of factors and circumstances contribute to the ultimate crash, and these precise circumstances are almost certain never to arise again.

However, the overarching causes of accidents are often similar. The Federal Aviation Administration has developed five common themes among airplane accidents: human error, flawed assumptions, organizational lapses, unintended effects and pre-existing failures.

Human Error: Almost every airplane crash involves some form of human error; in some cases, it is the primary cause while in other situations human error simply aggravates existing problems. A pilot may fail to recognize that he or she is bringing the plane down too quickly, resulting in a crash landing before reaching the runway. A member of a maintenance crew may not properly inspect the plane before take-off, thereby failing to notice that a component of the plane has become worn or needs repair. An air traffic control operator may provide unclear instructions, causing multiple pilots to presume they are clear for landing or ready for takeoff at the same time.

Flawed Assumption: When designing, operating and maintaining aircraft, those involved rely on certain assumptions about the aircraft and the potential circumstances it might encounter. When these assumptions are incorrect, the results can be catastrophic.

For example, in the crash of American Airlines Flight 587, the vertical stabilizer separated in the midst of a flight, causing the plane to crash. This separation occurred because of the first officer’s “unnecessary and excessive rudder pedal inputs.” Those designing the aircraft had not accounted for the possibility that the pedal would be used excessively, and the airplane crash occurred as a result.

Organizational Lapses: The safe operation of an airplane requires effective communication among many people. When an airline’s processes and procedures are not established to ensure that this communication takes place, accidents may occur. For example, when Continental Express Flight 2574 crashed, investigators determined that missing screw fasteners caused the crash. These fasteners had been removed as part of scheduled maintenance, but they were never replaced as they should have been prior to flight.

Unintended Effects: Processes, procedures and designs are frequently reviewed in the interest of making air transportation safer and more efficient. Unfortunately, changes to established procedures may have unanticipated consequences. In some cases these consequences may not be apparent for years after the original changes were initiated. When Dan-Air Services Flight 707-300 crashed, investigators determined that design changes intended to strengthen the stabilizer structure had inadvertently resulted in more stress, and ultimately caused the stabilizer to fail.

Pre-existing Failures: Some planes have design or manufacturing defects that can cause them to crash. These problems may be systemic across a fleet of airplanes or they may only exist on a single plane. When Turk Hava Flight TK981 crashed in France, for example, the accident was caused by a problem with the door latching mechanism. The mechanism was not properly engaged before takeoff, which allowed the door to come off of the plane while in-flight.

As these categories indicate, plane accidents almost always occur as the result of someone’s negligence. An individual may trigger a crash by negligently perform his or her duties, the airline may have system-wide problems allowing for accidents to arise, or the plane manufacturer may build the plane in a way that makes it susceptible to malfunction.

Accordingly, in many plane accidents, there are several potential parties who may be held liable for the collisions. For more information about liability following a plane accident, speak to a knowledgeable personal injury attorney.

Only Buying Two New Tires? Put Them on the Back.

  • 25
  • May
    2010

After winter is over, many people will take their vehicles to the local auto shop to buy new tires. The front tires wear faster than the rear tires since the majority of the braking is directed to the front tires, which is why there is so much more brake dust in the front rims. Because of this, often it is necessary to only replace two tires that are worn. For some, buying a set of four new tires is simply too expensive, so they opt for two new tires instead. In general, people take the tires for granted and do not understand that that car uses all four tire to turn, not just the front two.

Many tire dealers erroneously encourage car owners to put the two newest tires on the front of the vehicle and move the two older tires to the back. Among other reasons, they believe that it is easier for drivers to control a blowout in a back tire than it is in a front tire.  More often, both the tire installer and the car owner falsely but in good faith believe that better tires on the front give better steering.  Those who understand handling dynamics of automobiles know that such knowledge is not only false, but on a wet road could prove disaterous.

Putting the new tires on the front of your vehicle, however, is the wrong move -- and can be a fatal mistake. Rather than making the car more stable, new tires on the front and leaving worn tires on the rear will have just the opposite effect on a wet road surface, and cause you to lose control of the vehicle.

Correct New Tire Placement

Today's cars and trucks were designed to under-steer in order to accommodate inexperienced drivers who tend to slam on the brakes when they go into a turn to fast. A car that is not turning as much as the driver intends is descibed as understeering or "straightening out the curve." Understeer is easy to control, and the intuitive response is to apply brakes to slow and cranking in more steering to stay on th eroad.  This is the proper response, and the braking puts more weight on the front tires which gives them more of a bit and the rear tires follow the fronts around the curve.  Putting new tires are put on the front of the vehicle instead of the rear,  defeats this purposely designed in under-steering tendency in vehicle and turns it into an over-steering monster.  Oversteer is where the rear end breakaway first when going into a turn to fast, or after an emergency evasive maneuver.  Typically, oversteering is called "fishtailing" and is best idenified as the rear end going out of control.  Since the rear tires must have enough traction to follow the front tires around a turn, if the rear tires lose traction the car just follows the physics of the road surface out of control.  Most drivers do not know how to recover from this situation and a crash or going off the road sideways or backwards, or into opposing traffic is unaviodable.

Here's how: if a car has little tread on the rear tires and new tread on the front tires, then the car is going to be more prone to fishtailing on wet surfaces because the rear tires will not be able to gain traction on the slippery road. Once the car goes into a fishtail, then the car will automatically over-steer in an attempt to regain control. However, in these cases it will be very difficult if not impossible for the driver to regain control over the fishtailing vehicle. As a result, the driver will be more likely to be in accident, whether from colliding with another car or going off of the road.

Depending on the speed the car was traveling and other factors, these types of accidents can be catastrophic. The driver and any occupants in the vehicle may suffer very serious injuries from incorrect tire placement, including amputations, paralysis and permanent disability.
The dangers of incorrect tire placement are well known. The major tire manufacturers have included instructions in their guides for years that instruct tire installers to put the two newest tires on the back of the vehicle rather than the front. Additionally, there have been several studies, investigations and lawsuits that have uncovered the potential harm that may be caused by incorrect tire placement.

Conclusion

It is important to have good tread depth on your vehicle's tires, especially when you are driving on wet road surfaces. The best way to maintain your tire's tread depth is by regularly checking your tires and replacing them when the thread depth falls below 4/32'.
If you cannot afford to replace all of your tires at the same time, remember that you should have the two newest tires placed in the rear, rather than the front -- even if the mechanic tells you otherwise. This one small move can help you avoid becoming a victim of a rainy day accident.